top of page

Take Action: Tell USPS to Protect Voting by Mail

  • Writer: Carl Blair
    Carl Blair
  • Jun 29
  • 4 min read

Deadline

Submit by Thursday, July 2, 2026, 10:59 p.m. CT. The notice requests comments “on or before July 2, 2026.”


What is this?

The United States Postal Service (USPS) has issued a proposed rule that would drastically change how it handles mail-in ballots. This rule would cause widespread voter disenfranchisement across both Texas and the rest of the nation, and would particularly harm communities who frequently rely on voting by mail like college students, the elderly, and disabled voters.  


Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), before a federal entity, like the USPS, can implement a proposed rule, they have to provide the public with notice of the contents of the proposed rule and an opportunity to comment on the proposed rule. So this is your chance to voice opposition to this proposed rule.

Even though Texas already severely limits who can vote by mail, over 380,000 Texans voted by mail in the 2024 Presidential Election. Giving the USPS the unlawful and unprecedented authority to reject sending voters mail-in ballots risks disenfranchising the hundreds of thousands of Texas voters who rely on voting by mail in order to exercise their right to vote.

This March, President Trump issued an executive order that seeks to give the federal government unlawful authority over voting by mail. The Constitution grants Congress and the states the authority to administer elections, not the President, and certainly not the USPS. This proposed rule would implement the President’s unconstitutional executive order by coercing states into compliance by threatening to have the USPS refuse to deliver all mail-in ballots from any state that does not meet the proposed rule’s requirements.

How to Submit Your Comment

  1. Open the official comment page and follow the instructions.

    1. Start here: regulations.gov comment form for Ballot Mail for Federal Elections

  2. Instructions: “Email comments, containing the name and address of the commenter, may be sent to: PCFederalRegister@usps.gov, with a subject line of ‘Ballot Mail.’”

  3. Personalize your comment. Unique stories and concrete examples carry more weight than form letters.

  4. Do not include sensitive personal data you would not want posted publicly. The Federal Register notes that submissions are posted “without change,” including personal information.

Short Sample Comment Introduction (Copy and Personalize)

I am writing to comment on the proposed Ballot Mail for Federal Elections Rule (2026-10968) regarding changes to the Postal Service’s handling of mail-in ballots and use of information from state voters rolls . . .

Key Points You Can Make

Unlawfully Federalizing Elections

The Constitution gives Congress and the states joint authority over regulating elections, not the President. Voting by mail has existed in the United States, in some form, for over 200 years since Pennsylvania first allowed it for soldiers away from home back in 1813. Currently all 50 states allow for some form of voting by mail, and all of those states have administered scores of successful elections utilizing, at least in part, voting by mail. This proposed rule would strip states and election officials of the ability to fully administer voting by mail in their own states and would instead replace their authority with that of the USPS.

The United States Postal Service is not in the voter registration or election administration business. The legal responsibility of the USPS is to deliver the mail, including mail-in ballots. Yet this proposed rule would give the USPS the authority to refuse to mail any and all mail-in ballots from any state that does not comply with the requirements the rule lays out.

The proposed rule would require the USPS to implement untested systems of data collection and storage on a national scale that fall outside of their areas of expertise on a very short timeline. The rule contains no actual details about how the USPS would securely store or transmit the information it would start collecting and sharing with states, merely stating that the USPS will provide “technical assistance to states and localities regarding the secure submission of this data”.

This rule would place new and unfunded burdens on already strained election offices around the country just as they are preparing for the 2026 Midterm elections. Requiring election officials to implement entirely new data collection and submission systems on such a short timeline will inevitably lead to an additional strain on their ability to administer elections in their jurisdictions.

Be sure to cite sources of information included in your comment.

Optional Personalization Prompts

  • If you are an election official or poll worker, describe how implementing these changes would complicate your work on behalf of voters who rely on voting by mail.

  • If you are a voter who relies on voting by mail, describe concerns about how changes to voting by mail procedures would make it harder for you to vote.

  • If you work in privacy or cybersecurity, explain the problems a rushed and untested new system of data collection and sharing could cause.

  • If you are a civil rights advocate or community organizer, connect this to the importance of equal access to the ballot.

FAQs

Is this a proposed rule?

Yes, this is a proposed rule subject to the rulemaking process outlined by the federal Administrative Procedure Act (APA).  The APA requires that federal entities that propose a new rule must give the public notice of the contents of the proposed rule and the chance to comment on the proposed rule before it can be implemented: Federal Register 

The Federal Register notice for the United States Postal Service’s “Ballot Mail for Federal Elections 2026-10968” rule is linked here, with the comment deadline and details on how to submit your comment included: Federal Register

See both the Brennan Center’s explainer on the unlawful executive order that directly led to this proposed rule contents and Issue One’s explanation of the very serious problems with the proposed rule for more information. 

In addition, if you would like to learn more about the over 200 year history of voting by mail in the United States, last year TCRP hosted a presentation on voting by mail challenges facing active duty service members and United States citizens living abroad that contained a lengthy discussion of that history.


 
 
 

47 Comments


GA67
GA67
11 hours ago

Trong quá trình khám phá nhiều nguồn nội dung trực tuyến, mình đã ghé qua GA67. Trang web có cấu trúc rõ ràng và thuận tiện cho việc tìm kiếm thông tin.

Like

matcha match
matcha match
a day ago

Dạo này thấy nhiều người nhắc S8 nên mình cũng ghé thử cho biết thôi. Mình không đăng ký hay chơi gì cả, chủ yếu xem cách họ làm trang và sắp nội dung ra sao. Lướt qua thì thấy giao diện khá dễ chịu, kiểu chia từng khối thông tin rõ ràng nên đọc nhanh vẫn không bị rối mắt. Có đoạn họ nhấn mạnh chuyện bảo mật với hỗ trợ 24 7, nhìn vậy cũng yên tâm hơn chút dù mình chỉ xem qua. Mình thích cái cảm giác cuộn xuống là gặp các tiêu đề box tách bạch, biết ngay đang ở phần nào chứ không bị dính một mớ chữ dài, mấy khung nội dung nhìn

Like

mfu88433
a day ago

There have been nights when I told myself I would play for just five minutes, and then suddenly an hour had passed. Wacky Steps has that irresistible pull that makes you lose track of time and forget about everything else. The game is proof that great design does not need to be complicated.

Like

Mars
Mars
2 days ago

Có lần đang đi du lịch nước ngoài thì bỗng nghe thấy có một nhóm người trên máy bay bàn tán về U888, nghe những lời họ nói thì có vẻ như trang web này được khá nhiều người biết đến. Mình vốn không để ý mấy chuyện này nên chỉ nghe ké vài câu rồi nhớ tên. Sau đó vì tò mò mình mới thử tìm xem, ấn tượng đầu tiên là giao diện khá thân thiện, các mục được chia rõ và cách trình bày nhìn tương đối thoáng.

Like

utamainquiry
2 days ago

I find speedx track package useful when I want to understand where a parcel is during transit. The tracking history can provide a simple timeline of movement, which makes waiting less uncertain. I especially like seeing updates connected to different stages, since a package may pass through several locations before reaching its destination. Having current information available makes it easier to follow progress calmly and understand that a gap between updates does not always mean something is wrong.

Like
bottom of page