Take Action: Tell USPS to Protect Voting by Mail

Deadline
Submit by Thursday, July 2, 2026, 10:59 p.m. CT. The notice requests comments “on or before July 2, 2026.”
What is this?
The United States Postal Service (USPS) has issued a proposed rule that would drastically change how it handles mail-in ballots. This rule would cause widespread voter disenfranchisement across both Texas and the rest of the nation, and would particularly harm communities who frequently rely on voting by mail like college students, the elderly, and disabled voters.
Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), before a federal entity, like the USPS, can implement a proposed rule, they have to provide the public with notice of the contents of the proposed rule and an opportunity to comment on the proposed rule. So this is your chance to voice opposition to this proposed rule.
Why it matters?
Even though Texas already severely limits who can vote by mail, over 380,000 Texans voted by mail in the 2024 Presidential Election. Giving the USPS the unlawful and unprecedented authority to reject sending voters mail-in ballots risks disenfranchising the hundreds of thousands of Texas voters who rely on voting by mail in order to exercise their right to vote.
Context
This March, President Trump issued an executive order that seeks to give the federal government unlawful authority over voting by mail. The Constitution grants Congress and the states the authority to administer elections, not the President, and certainly not the USPS. This proposed rule would implement the President’s unconstitutional executive order by coercing states into compliance by threatening to have the USPS refuse to deliver all mail-in ballots from any state that does not meet the proposed rule’s requirements.
How to Submit Your Comment
Open the official comment page and follow the instructions.
Instructions: “Email comments, containing the name and address of the commenter, may be sent to: PCFederalRegister@usps.gov, with a subject line of ‘Ballot Mail.’”
Personalize your comment. Unique stories and concrete examples carry more weight than form letters.
Do not include sensitive personal data you would not want posted publicly. The Federal Register notes that submissions are posted “without change,” including personal information.
Short Sample Comment Introduction (Copy and Personalize)
I am writing to comment on the proposed Ballot Mail for Federal Elections Rule (2026-10968) regarding changes to the Postal Service’s handling of mail-in ballots and use of information from state voters rolls . . .
Key Points You Can Make
Unlawfully Federalizing Elections
The Constitution gives Congress and the states joint authority over regulating elections, not the President. Voting by mail has existed in the United States, in some form, for over 200 years since Pennsylvania first allowed it for soldiers away from home back in 1813. Currently all 50 states allow for some form of voting by mail, and all of those states have administered scores of successful elections utilizing, at least in part, voting by mail. This proposed rule would strip states and election officials of the ability to fully administer voting by mail in their own states and would instead replace their authority with that of the USPS.
The USPS has no Legal Role in Administering Elections
The United States Postal Service is not in the voter registration or election administration business. The legal responsibility of the USPS is to deliver the mail, including mail-in ballots. Yet this proposed rule would give the USPS the authority to refuse to mail any and all mail-in ballots from any state that does not comply with the requirements the rule lays out.
Privacy Concerns
The proposed rule would require the USPS to implement untested systems of data collection and storage on a national scale that fall outside of their areas of expertise on a very short timeline. The rule contains no actual details about how the USPS would securely store or transmit the information it would start collecting and sharing with states, merely stating that the USPS will provide “technical assistance to states and localities regarding the secure submission of this data”.
Election Administration Burdens
This rule would place new and unfunded burdens on already strained election offices around the country just as they are preparing for the 2026 Midterm elections. Requiring election officials to implement entirely new data collection and submission systems on such a short timeline will inevitably lead to an additional strain on their ability to administer elections in their jurisdictions.
Be sure to cite sources of information included in your comment.
Optional Personalization Prompts
If you are an election official or poll worker, describe how implementing these changes would complicate your work on behalf of voters who rely on voting by mail.
If you are a voter who relies on voting by mail, describe concerns about how changes to voting by mail procedures would make it harder for you to vote.
If you work in privacy or cybersecurity, explain the problems a rushed and untested new system of data collection and sharing could cause.
If you are a civil rights advocate or community organizer, connect this to the importance of equal access to the ballot.
FAQs
Is this a proposed rule?
Yes, this is a proposed rule subject to the rulemaking process outlined by the federal Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The APA requires that federal entities that propose a new rule must give the public notice of the contents of the proposed rule and the chance to comment on the proposed rule before it can be implemented: Federal Register
Where do I find the official notice?
The Federal Register notice for the United States Postal Service’s “Ballot Mail for Federal Elections 2026-10968” rule is linked here, with the comment deadline and details on how to submit your comment included: Federal Register
Where can I learn more about this rule’s risks to voters?
See both the Brennan Center’s explainer on the unlawful executive order that directly led to this proposed rule contents and Issue One’s explanation of the very serious problems with the proposed rule for more information.
In addition, if you would like to learn more about the over 200 year history of voting by mail in the United States, last year TCRP hosted a presentation on voting by mail challenges facing active duty service members and United States citizens living abroad that contained a lengthy discussion of that history.
TCRP: Democracy Deep Dive (relevant times: 4:04 to 13:28)



https://sc88.market/ tình cờ được mình biết đến khi đang đọc một bài viết về quản lý tài liệu và xem phần nguồn tham khảo ở cuối trang. Thấy tên này nằm trong danh sách nên mình mở thử cho biết, chủ yếu tò mò xem cách trình bày có khác những công cụ mình từng thấy không. Mình chỉ lướt qua vài trang, không đi sâu vào từng tính năng. Điều dễ nhận thấy là bố cục khá sạch, tiêu đề và nội dung được phân biệt rõ, chuyển qua các khu vực cũng tương đối thuận. Xem nhanh trên máy tính lẫn điện thoại đều không tạo cảm giác quá rối.
Protecting the right to vote by mail is essential, and it’s concerning to think that changes to postal procedures could create extra barriers for voters. This article reminded me of a related discussion I recently saw on England & Derbyshire Solicitors about how important clear guidance and fair processes are when people's rights are at stake.
BM 88 tình cờ được mình biết đến khi đang đọc một bài viết về quản lý tài liệu và xem phần nguồn tham khảo ở cuối trang. Thấy tên này nằm trong danh sách nên mình mở thử cho biết, chủ yếu tò mò xem cách trình bày có khác những công cụ mình từng thấy không. Mình chỉ lướt qua vài trang, không đi sâu vào từng tính năng. Điều dễ nhận thấy là bố cục khá sạch, tiêu đề và nội dung được phân biệt rõ, chuyển qua các khu vực cũng tương đối thuận. Xem nhanh trên máy tính lẫn điện thoại đều không tạo cảm giác quá rối.
Có một lần mình đang đọc dở một bài tổng hợp trên mạng thì thấy DN88 xuất hiện xen giữa phần nội dung. Lúc đó cũng không có ý định tìm hiểu gì sâu, chỉ tò mò bấm vào xem thử cho biết. Mình lướt nhanh vài mục để cảm nhận cách bố trí chung, và ấn tượng đầu tiên là mọi thứ được sắp xếp khá gọn gàng cùng các trò quen thuộc như slot, game bài, bắn cá nhìn vào không bị rối mắt. Xem xong mình quay lại bài đang đọc, nhưng trong đầu vẫn nhớ là giao diện khá dễ theo dõi.
S666.COM mình có ghé vào xem thử sau khi thấy được nhắc đến trong một vài nội dung trên mạng, chủ yếu để tham khảo cách họ thiết kế giao diện và sắp xếp thông tin. Mình chỉ xem nhanh tổng thể nên chưa tìm hiểu sâu, nhưng có thể thấy cách bố trí khá rõ ràng, các phần nội dung được chia hợp lý nên nhìn vào không bị rối mắt. Thanh điều hướng hiển thị dễ thấy, giúp việc chuyển giữa các mục diễn ra khá nhanh. Khi truy cập bằng điện thoại, trang vẫn hoạt động ổn định, thao tác tương đối mượt. Tổng thể mang lại cảm giác đơn giản và dễ sử dụng.