top of page

Take Action: Tell USPS to Protect Voting by Mail

Writer: Carl Blair
Carl Blair
Jun 29
4 min read

Deadline

Submit by Thursday, July 2, 2026, 10:59 p.m. CT. The notice requests comments “on or before July 2, 2026.”


What is this?

The United States Postal Service (USPS) has issued a proposed rule that would drastically change how it handles mail-in ballots. This rule would cause widespread voter disenfranchisement across both Texas and the rest of the nation, and would particularly harm communities who frequently rely on voting by mail like college students, the elderly, and disabled voters.  


Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), before a federal entity, like the USPS, can implement a proposed rule, they have to provide the public with notice of the contents of the proposed rule and an opportunity to comment on the proposed rule. So this is your chance to voice opposition to this proposed rule.

Even though Texas already severely limits who can vote by mail, over 380,000 Texans voted by mail in the 2024 Presidential Election. Giving the USPS the unlawful and unprecedented authority to reject sending voters mail-in ballots risks disenfranchising the hundreds of thousands of Texas voters who rely on voting by mail in order to exercise their right to vote.

This March, President Trump issued an executive order that seeks to give the federal government unlawful authority over voting by mail. The Constitution grants Congress and the states the authority to administer elections, not the President, and certainly not the USPS. This proposed rule would implement the President’s unconstitutional executive order by coercing states into compliance by threatening to have the USPS refuse to deliver all mail-in ballots from any state that does not meet the proposed rule’s requirements.

How to Submit Your Comment

  1. Open the official comment page and follow the instructions.

    1. Start here: regulations.gov comment form for Ballot Mail for Federal Elections

  2. Instructions: “Email comments, containing the name and address of the commenter, may be sent to: PCFederalRegister@usps.gov, with a subject line of ‘Ballot Mail.’”

  3. Personalize your comment. Unique stories and concrete examples carry more weight than form letters.

  4. Do not include sensitive personal data you would not want posted publicly. The Federal Register notes that submissions are posted “without change,” including personal information.

Short Sample Comment Introduction (Copy and Personalize)

I am writing to comment on the proposed Ballot Mail for Federal Elections Rule (2026-10968) regarding changes to the Postal Service’s handling of mail-in ballots and use of information from state voters rolls . . .

Key Points You Can Make

Unlawfully Federalizing Elections

The Constitution gives Congress and the states joint authority over regulating elections, not the President. Voting by mail has existed in the United States, in some form, for over 200 years since Pennsylvania first allowed it for soldiers away from home back in 1813. Currently all 50 states allow for some form of voting by mail, and all of those states have administered scores of successful elections utilizing, at least in part, voting by mail. This proposed rule would strip states and election officials of the ability to fully administer voting by mail in their own states and would instead replace their authority with that of the USPS.

The United States Postal Service is not in the voter registration or election administration business. The legal responsibility of the USPS is to deliver the mail, including mail-in ballots. Yet this proposed rule would give the USPS the authority to refuse to mail any and all mail-in ballots from any state that does not comply with the requirements the rule lays out.

The proposed rule would require the USPS to implement untested systems of data collection and storage on a national scale that fall outside of their areas of expertise on a very short timeline. The rule contains no actual details about how the USPS would securely store or transmit the information it would start collecting and sharing with states, merely stating that the USPS will provide “technical assistance to states and localities regarding the secure submission of this data”.

This rule would place new and unfunded burdens on already strained election offices around the country just as they are preparing for the 2026 Midterm elections. Requiring election officials to implement entirely new data collection and submission systems on such a short timeline will inevitably lead to an additional strain on their ability to administer elections in their jurisdictions.

Be sure to cite sources of information included in your comment.

Optional Personalization Prompts

  • If you are an election official or poll worker, describe how implementing these changes would complicate your work on behalf of voters who rely on voting by mail.

  • If you are a voter who relies on voting by mail, describe concerns about how changes to voting by mail procedures would make it harder for you to vote.

  • If you work in privacy or cybersecurity, explain the problems a rushed and untested new system of data collection and sharing could cause.

  • If you are a civil rights advocate or community organizer, connect this to the importance of equal access to the ballot.

FAQs

Is this a proposed rule?

Yes, this is a proposed rule subject to the rulemaking process outlined by the federal Administrative Procedure Act (APA).  The APA requires that federal entities that propose a new rule must give the public notice of the contents of the proposed rule and the chance to comment on the proposed rule before it can be implemented: Federal Register 

The Federal Register notice for the United States Postal Service’s “Ballot Mail for Federal Elections 2026-10968” rule is linked here, with the comment deadline and details on how to submit your comment included: Federal Register

See both the Brennan Center’s explainer on the unlawful executive order that directly led to this proposed rule contents and Issue One’s explanation of the very serious problems with the proposed rule for more information. 

In addition, if you would like to learn more about the over 200 year history of voting by mail in the United States, last year TCRP hosted a presentation on voting by mail challenges facing active duty service members and United States citizens living abroad that contained a lengthy discussion of that history.


 
 
 

165 Comments


Mars Pham
Mars Pham
13 hours ago

https://vipwin2.life/ tình cờ được mình chú ý trong lúc đang dọn lại một loạt tab trình duyệt mở từ trước. Có một tab mình chưa xem kỹ nên tiện tay mở lại để biết nội dung là gì. Mình không có ý định ngồi nghiên cứu lâu, chủ yếu xem nhanh trang có dễ sử dụng không. Phần giao diện khá sạch, các mục chính được đặt ở vị trí dễ nhận ra và chuyển sang khu vực khác cũng không mất nhiều thao tác. Mình thử kéo xuống vài lần rồi quay lại phần đầu, mọi thứ vẫn khá dễ theo dõi. Một lần ghé xem ngắn nhưng bố cục tạo ấn tượng khá gọn.

Like

trung651188duong
13 hours ago

Some articles compel me to slow down because the subject matter is rather sensitive, and content regarding the grief of losing a pet is one such instance. Previously, I had encountered the topic Trang chủ F168  of reward-based card games—often associated with leisure and passing the time. Placing these two subjects side by side, I realize that each situation calls for a distinct approach. The section discussing how to cherish memories and allow oneself to grieve is written with great restraint, avoiding the trap of offering hollow words of encouragement.

Like

Gem 88
14 hours ago

Mình thấy mọi người nhắc r666 casino khá nhiều nên cũng tiện tay bấm vào xem thử, chủ yếu vì tò mò chứ không có ý tìm hiểu quá sâu. Mình chỉ lướt một vòng để xem giao diện được sắp xếp thế nào. Cảm giác đầu tiên là trang nhìn khá thoáng, nội dung chia thành từng khu vực riêng nên không bị dồn vào một chỗ. Menu được đặt khá dễ thấy, mình thử chuyển qua vài mục thì thao tác cũng tương đối nhanh, không phải kéo lên kéo xuống liên tục. Phần chữ và màu sắc nhìn vừa mắt, không có quá nhiều chi tiết chen nhau. Nhìn chung, chỉ cần xem qua một lúc là mình…

Like

Gem 88
14 hours ago

Mình thấy mọi người nhắc d188 casino khá nhiều nên cũng tiện tay bấm vào xem thử, chủ yếu vì tò mò chứ không có ý tìm hiểu quá sâu. Mình chỉ lướt một vòng để xem giao diện được sắp xếp thế nào. Cảm giác đầu tiên là trang nhìn khá thoáng, nội dung chia thành từng khu vực riêng nên không bị dồn vào một chỗ. Menu được đặt khá dễ thấy, mình thử chuyển qua vài mục thì thao tác cũng tương đối nhanh, không phải kéo lên kéo xuống liên tục. Phần chữ và màu sắc nhìn vừa mắt, không có quá nhiều chi tiết chen nhau. Nhìn chung, chỉ cần xem qua một lúc là mình…

Like

Gem 88
14 hours ago

jd88 casino được nhắc đến khi đang đọc một vài chia sẻ trên mạng nên cũng mở vào xem thử. Mình không dành nhiều thời gian khám phá hết các nội dung, chủ yếu xem cách họ bố trí giao diện và phân chia các chuyên mục. Ấn tượng đầu tiên là bố cục được làm khá mạch lạc, các phần thông tin được sắp xếp theo từng nhóm nên nhìn tổng thể khá dễ theo dõi và không tạo cảm giác quá nhiều nội dung dồn vào một chỗ. Mình cũng để ý việc di chuyển giữa các mục khá thuận tiện nhờ thanh điều hướng được bố trí rõ ràng.

Like
bottom of page